Carrel turns the papers you have collected into a living structure of claims, evidence, counter-evidence and manuscript sections. See what supports each claim, where the literature disagrees, and trace every idea back to the exact passage before it reaches your manuscript.
Finding the papers is the part that works. The hard part comes after: seeing how they fit together, and knowing what to write next. The papers are read, the page is still blank, and nobody shows you the step in between.
01 · Read what matters
02 · Make sense of the literature
03 · Write from the evidence
01 / 07Scroll to explore
Bring in the papers you already have.
Bring your whole Zotero library across with its collections, drop in PDFs, or paste a DOI or arXiv id. Three hundred papers become one working set: parsed, enriched from Crossref and OpenAlex, and ready to read, search and cite.
For the papers you have to read properly, not skim.
Highlight in four colours, keep notes on the page, and ask for an explanation of any passage in the context of the paper. The queue remembers where you stopped and tells you how long is left.
Ask your papers a question. Check the answer in one click.
Answers come only from papers you imported. Every sentence carries a citation, and clicking it opens that paper at the passage. Nothing is asserted without a source, and when the evidence is not there, you are told so instead of guessed at.
See who agrees, who contradicts, and what nobody has answered.
Claims, methods and findings are pulled out of your papers with their exact quotes, linked by citation and by what they support or contradict. When you draft, those disagreements come through as contrast — “however”, “in contrast” — instead of a list. The gaps between them are flagged, which is where a contribution usually is.
A starting outline, built from what you have actually read.
Carrel proposes the sections — background, what the field agrees on, where it contradicts itself, where the gap is — and fills each one with the claims and saved answers behind it. Rename them, merge them, throw out what is wrong. It is the synthesis matrix your supervisor keeps asking for, arriving filled in instead of blank.
The first draft arrives with its citations attached.
Pick a section and Carrel drafts it from your passages only, arguing where your papers disagree. A citation is a live link to a page, not text you typed — so when your paragraph moves away from what the source actually said, Carrel flags it. Cite in APA, MLA, Chicago, IEEE or Nature.
Your supervisor never has to leave Word.
Export a real .docx whose tracked changes open as tracked changes in Word, attributed to the right person. They mark it up the way they always have and send it back — nothing to install, no account, no new tool to learn. Markdown, LaTeX and BibTeX come out too.
01Read what matters·Your papers, together
Bring in the papers you already have.
Bring your whole Zotero library across with its collections, drop in PDFs, or paste a DOI or arXiv id. Three hundred papers become one working set: parsed, enriched from Crossref and OpenAlex, and ready to read, search and cite.
01Read what matters·Reading and annotating
For the papers you have to read properly, not skim.
Highlight in four colours, keep notes on the page, and ask for an explanation of any passage in the context of the paper. The queue remembers where you stopped and tells you how long is left.
01Read what matters·Asking the papers
Ask your papers a question. Check the answer in one click.
Answers come only from papers you imported. Every sentence carries a citation, and clicking it opens that paper at the passage. Nothing is asserted without a source, and when the evidence is not there, you are told so instead of guessed at.
02Make sense of the literature·Agreement and conflict
See who agrees, who contradicts, and what nobody has answered.
Claims, methods and findings are pulled out of your papers with their exact quotes, linked by citation and by what they support or contradict. When you draft, those disagreements come through as contrast — “however”, “in contrast” — instead of a list. The gaps between them are flagged, which is where a contribution usually is.
02Make sense of the literature·Themes and structure
A starting outline, built from what you have actually read.
Carrel proposes the sections — background, what the field agrees on, where it contradicts itself, where the gap is — and fills each one with the claims and saved answers behind it. Rename them, merge them, throw out what is wrong. It is the synthesis matrix your supervisor keeps asking for, arriving filled in instead of blank.
03Write from the evidence·Drafting and citing
The first draft arrives with its citations attached.
Pick a section and Carrel drafts it from your passages only, arguing where your papers disagree. A citation is a live link to a page, not text you typed — so when your paragraph moves away from what the source actually said, Carrel flags it. Cite in APA, MLA, Chicago, IEEE or Nature.
03Write from the evidence·Handing it over
Your supervisor never has to leave Word.
Export a real .docx whose tracked changes open as tracked changes in Word, attributed to the right person. They mark it up the way they always have and send it back — nothing to install, no account, no new tool to learn. Markdown, LaTeX and BibTeX come out too.
Ask anything. Every sentence cites the page it came from.
Answers are built only from papers you imported. Click a citation and the paper opens at that passage — so you are never taking the assistant’s word for anything.
Where do these papers disagree about the masking rate?
Cited answer
Both mask 15% of tokens, but BERT fixes the mask during preprocessing, so the same positions are predicted every epoch. 1RoBERTa keeps the rate and re-samples the mask each epoch, and reports that the static mask costs accuracy downstream. 2
1BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers· p. 4
2RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approach· p. 5
PDF assistantshelp you understand one paper at a time.
Writing assistantshelp you generate prose.
Carrel connects the work in between: deciding what the literature actually supports, constructing your claims, resolving contradictions, and turning that reasoning into a manuscript.
Pro for the researcher writing it, Team for a lab, Enterprise for a department. Billing yearly saves 30%. Nothing is charged during the trial, and you can cancel before it ends. Prices in USD.
500 more for $5. A heavy month costs a few dollars instead of stopping you.
Buying for an institution?
Single sign-on, usage reporting for the library, security and data-residency review, onboarding for a cohort, and an annual agreement on a purchase order. Priced per department or site, not per head.
Every citation is a link to a specific passage in a paper you imported, not a string a model typed. Click it and the reader opens at that page. Nothing is asserted without a source, and when the evidence is not in your library the assistant says so rather than guessing.
Will it write my literature review for me?
No, and it is not trying to. It gets you past the blank page: the papers read and indexed, the claims extracted with their quotes, the agreements and contradictions mapped, and a first draft of a section you chose, cited to the passages behind it. The argument is yours.
Is there a student price?
Yes. Pro is $60 for the year on a verified .edu or university address — $5 a month, and about two thirds off the standard yearly price. If you would rather not commit to a year, the 6-month thesis pass is $90 paid once, with nothing to cancel.
What does billing yearly save?
30% against paying monthly — Pro is $14 a month billed yearly instead of $20, so $168 rather than $240. The yearly trial is longer too: 20 days instead of 14.
What counts as a cited answer?
One question to the research assistant, answered from your own papers with page citations. Reading, highlighting, extraction and searching are never metered. If a heavy month runs Pro out, 500 more answers are $5; Team and Enterprise are uncapped.
How do I add my supervisor or my lab?
Invite them from inside Carrel and the workspace moves to Team, billed per seat from that point. Shared projects, reading assignments and review queues come with it, and whoever holds the grant can take over the billing.
Do I have to leave Zotero?
No. Import a library or a few collections with their PDFs whenever you like; papers already in Carrel are skipped, so the import can be run again. Zotero stays your reference manager if you want it to.
Who can see my papers?
Only you and the members of the projects you share. PDFs live in private storage behind expiring links, and isolation is enforced in the database itself rather than only in the application, so a bug in the app cannot hand somebody else your library.
One workflow, more than a literature review
Theses
Dissertations
Journal papers
Conference papers
Research proposals
Papers in. Manuscript out.
Carrel organises the evidence between the two, and keeps every sentence attached to the passage it came from. The argument is yours.